Will Controls Be Key to Circadian Lighting?

Lighting

June 28, 2021

By Craig DiLouie

While “circadian lighting” varies in definition, it generally refers to design that uses intensity and spectrum of light for a non-visual effect — namely, to support regulation of circadian rhythms. A new study suggests that by enabling intensity and spectral adjustment and optimizing exposure based on time of day, designers and owners can minimize the energy trade-off imposed by associated typically much higher light levels. This would entail use of an advanced lighting control system capable of scheduled dimming and perhaps spectral emission adjustment.

Circadian lighting, or biologically effective lighting, is the culmination of decades of research, though as a design practice it is new to the lighting industry. As such, it’s evolving as ongoing research is incorporated. In the meantime, the WELL Building Standard V.2, UL Design Guideline 24480, and the Collaborative for High-Performance Schools (CHPS) Core Design Criteria 3.0 all provide lighting design recommendation and goalposts for circadian lighting implementation.

In some cases, the guidelines significantly vary, either in the primary metric used or in the target values. The primary metrics used in these guidelines are equivalent melanopic flux (EML) and circadian stimulus (CS). As an example of variation in target values, at the time the study was published, the WELL Education Pilot recommended EML ≥ 125 m-lux as an appropriate stimulus four hours per day, while CHPS recommended that EML ≥ 250 m-lux was needed. As a result, it is difficult to say what “effective implementation” truly means, as again the guidelines vary and continue to evolve as new research becomes available and is incorporated.

Meanwhile, a key question in making these guidelines actionable is the potential impact on energy use, as they may pose significant increases in indoor light levels.

This was the focus of a new study by the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), which evaluated energy use in simulated designs attempting to comply with the guidelines. Funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, the study found significant increases in indoor light levels and associated energy consumption, suggesting an energy tradeoff in realizing circadian lighting goals.

PNNL modeled an open office and classroom, varying light output, spectral emission, light distribution, task orientation, duration of stimulus exposure, and more in a series of simulations totaling 45 unique conditions. The researchers determined that current IES task light level recommendations did not satisfy EML and CS targets for either office or classroom environments.

Lighting

“In some cases, meeting the circadian metric recommendations required an average illuminance that was more than double the IES recommendations, which may negatively affect lighting quality and increase energy use,” noted the study’s authors in their report. Satisfying circadian metric recommendations in some cases also required correlated colour temperatures (CCTs) much higher than typically used in open offices and classrooms.

Overall, PNNL estimated a 10-100%increase in annual energy use depending on the number of hours per day the circadian guideline is met. The more conservative energy estimates, closer to 10-15%, involved limiting duration of circadian stimulus to four hours per day, which would most effectively be implemented using an advanced lighting control system providing what is sometimes referred to as “light showers.”

Tunable-white offers utility for circadian stimulus but presents its own trade-offs of increased complexity and modestly higher energy consumption. Another option to reduce the required quantity of electric light is daylight, though that has its own challenges, notably variability in daylight availability.

So will lighting controls be key to unlocking the potential of circadian lighting? As again the field is evolving, this remains to be seen. The study authors noted that the energy trade-off cannot be fully expressed until circadian lighting metrics and effective stimulus delivery are better understood.

As circadian lighting may require higher indoor light levels, however, advanced controls are certainly well positioned for their ability to automatically adjust intensity and spectrum based on time of day.

As shown by this study, limiting the duration of circadian stimulus by adjusting intensity and spectrum can support circadian lighting implementations while minimizing the energy trade-off. As such, lighting controls will be considered along with other factors in future research that may be undertaken to explore the trade-off and how it can be mitigated. And lighting controls should be considered when seeking to implement current circadian lighting guidelines.

Read the study here www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2020/08/f77/ssl-safranek-etal-2020_EnergyBuildings_energy-impact.pdf.

Craig DiLouie, L.C., is a lighting industry journalist, analyst and marketing consultant. Learn more at ZINGinc.com http://www.zinginc.com/  and LightNOWblog.com.​

Published with the permission of Lighting Controls Association.

Related Articles


Latest Articles

  • ESA has Identified Increasing Safety Concern Surrounding Meter Base Installations

    ESA has Identified Increasing Safety Concern Surrounding Meter Base Installations

    April 18, 2025 ESA and EFC are raising awareness on an increasing safety concern the ESA has identified surrounding meter base installations. ESA identified an increase of installed meter bases where the neutral block is isolated from the enclosure. According to OESC Rule 10-210 a bonding conductor must be installed between the meter base and… Read More…

  • Non-residential Construction Investment Continues to Reach Record Highs in January 2025

    Non-residential Construction Investment Continues to Reach Record Highs in January 2025

    April 18, 2025 Overall, investment in building construction rose 1.8% (+$393.7 million) to $22.1 billion in January. The residential sector increased 2.3% to $15.4 billion, while the non-residential sector was up 0.8% to $6.7 billion. Year over year, investment in building construction grew 5.7% in January. On a constant dollar basis (2017=100), investment in building construction increased 1.5% from the previous month to $13.2 billion… Read More…

  • BC Non-Residential Drives Growth, Multi-Family Component Drives Residential Decline in February Building Permits

    BC Non-Residential Drives Growth, Multi-Family Component Drives Residential Decline in February Building Permits

    April 18, 2025 In February, the total value of building permits issued in Canada increased by $371.3 million (+2.9%) to $13.1 billion. Gains in construction intentions were led by British Columbia’s non-residential sector. On a constant dollar basis (2017=100), the total value of building permits issued in February grew 3.2% from the previous month and was up 5.6% on… Read More…

  • Navigating Tariffs: Practical Strategies for ECABC Members

    Navigating Tariffs: Practical Strategies for ECABC Members

    April 18, 2025 Canadian businesses are facing uncertain and unprecedented risks created by tariffs on Canadian goods from the United States. The combination of the economic impact to BC’s economy from these tariffs, and the potential increase in the cost of construction materials and equipment as Canada is forced to respond with retaliatory tariffs, has… Read More…


Changing Scene

  • Ontario Introduces Legistlation to Unlock Trade and Labour Mobility Within Canada

    Ontario Introduces Legistlation to Unlock Trade and Labour Mobility Within Canada

    April 18, 2025 As a next step in its plan to protect Ontario by unleashing the province’s economy, the Ontario government is introducing the Protect Ontario through Free Trade within Canada Act to unlock free trade and labour mobility within Canada. This legislation will, if passed, create new opportunities for job creation and investment attraction, supporting economic… Read More…

  • Ontario, P.E.I. Join Nova Scotia With Legislation to Remove Internal Trade Barriers

    Ontario, P.E.I. Join Nova Scotia With Legislation to Remove Internal Trade Barriers

    April 18, 2025 Prince Edward Island and Ontario have joined the Nova Scotia by introducing reciprocal legislation that will help foster an environment of mutual recognition of goods, services and labour mobility between these provinces. “Leaders across the country are expressing interest in removing trade barriers, and I’m very pleased that P.E.I. and Ontario have… Read More…

  • New Brunswick Signs MOU with Ontario to Reduce Trade and Labour Mobility Barriers

    New Brunswick Signs MOU with Ontario to Reduce Trade and Labour Mobility Barriers

    April 18, 2025 The governments of New Brunswick and Ontario have signed a memorandum of understanding on free trade and labour mobility. “Ontario is New Brunswick’s second-biggest trading partner, and we are excited to be building on the positive momentum to reduce internal trade barriers across Canada,” said Premier Susan Holt. “Today’s signing of this… Read More…

  • EFC Welcomes New Manufacturer Member: MegaResistors Corp.

    EFC Welcomes New Manufacturer Member: MegaResistors Corp.

    April 18, 2025 Founded in 2008, MegaResistors is a proudly Canadian company specializing in the design and production of high-quality power resistors, including grounding resistors, braking resistors and resistive load banks, tailored for demanding industry and mission critical applications. Their extensive line of products helps them meet the needs of the industry, from crane control… Read More…