Safety and Risk in Electrical Low-Voltage Installations, Part 1

Safety

 July 13, 2018

By Alfred Mörx

As an indispensable basic concept for all reflections on protective technology in low‐voltage installations, the concept of security is widely recognized today as “freedom from unacceptable damage risks.”

This means that safety is freedom from every unacceptable damage risk, and enables the classification of situations as “safe” or “dangerous.” The purpose of planning and implementing low‐voltage installations is to achieve safety while excluding risks.

Since many discussions that have been held on the topic of clearly delimiting safety, and risks have been known for years in professional circles, only a few core statements will be elaborated here.

The relationship between risk and safety is represented in the figure below.

Safety 2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Principles of safety philosophy for low‐voltage installations and low‐voltage equipment from a technical risk perspective. Reduction of the residual risk through additional measures that lead to clearly falling below the highest acceptable risk (“limiting risk”) towards increased safety.

In practice, taking adequate measures when planning and making equipment (e.g., low‐voltage switchgear assemblies) ensures that any risk that remains after the application of protective measures is as low as possible, and under no circumstances higher than the highest acceptable risk.

This highest acceptable risk, often called “limiting risk,” must be achieved with every switchgear assembly; in this respect, all measures that contribute to achieving this limiting risk constitute minimal risk reduction measures. The requirements set forth in generally accepted technical standards define those minimal protection requirements.

This highest acceptable risk may not under any circumstances be confused with the concept of residual risk because any technician entrusted with safety‐relevant work must strive to keep the residual risk, which can never been completely excluded even when applying technical measures, well below the highest acceptable limit (i.e., as far as possible driving it in the direction of safety).

7 reasons for implementing safety precautions

There are many reasons for implementing measures in low‐voltage switchgear combinations that go beyond the highest acceptable risk in the direction of higher safety. Here are seven, based on practical experience:

• during the production, installation or maintenance in the switchgear assembly, conductive materials or assemblies may be left behind by mistake (“forgotten”)
• undetected material defects may exist or have been created during processing in the switchgear assembly.
• small animals such as mice or snakes getting into the switchgear assembly
• use of a switchgear assembly unsuitable for the application, which may lead to overheating and subsequently to internal arcing
• unsuitable operating conditions (e.g., ambient temperature, humidity)
• incorrect operation
• insufficient servicing and/or timeouts during preventative maintenance

Switchgear assemblies that only fulfil the minimum requirements are very likely to fall below the highest acceptable risk when one of the events above occurs. Additional action can reduce the extent of damage in the installations and/or business interruptions. This also applies to injuries that may be sustained by employees who work in or near the plants. As it were, the low‐voltage switchgear assemblies equipped with additional measures have some kind of “safety reserve.”

Risk and consequential damage

Reflections on the minimal residual risk that can be achieved through technical measures, especially in commercially and/or industrially used plants, must occur against the background of the possible consequential damage to be expected.

Consequential damage includes costs that arise during business interruptions. Business interruptions in manufacturing companies can arise from a number of causes (e.g., shortage of raw materials, unplanned downtime as a result of occurring malfunctions caused by mechanical, electrical or control issues).

However, consequential damage also includes costs that among other things arise as a result of an insufficiently reliable power supply (e.g., through nuisance tripping of protective equipment during storms).

Safety 3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consequential damages (cost types) in the case of downtime of electrically powered production or processing plants

Without claiming to be exhaustive, major components of possible consequential damages are summarized in the chart above.

Of particular significance are business interruptions that occur as a result of a failure of power supply following damage or partial or complete destruction of the power distribution system (substation, main distribution boards and sub‐distribution boards, cables and wiring systems). The particular significance of this group of business operations is that downtime costs and additional costs strongly increase with increasing length of interruption. In many cases, short‐run servicing of the plant and the replacement of the operating equipment necessary for servicing (e.g., circuit breakers, bus systems) is not possible.

In Part 2: consequential damage and its costs.

Alfred Mörx is the owner of diam‐consult, a consulting engineering office for physics focusing on risk analysis and protective technology in complex technical systems, since 2001. He studied technical physics at the Vienna University of Technology. As an expert for basic electrotechnical safety matters, he has been working in national, European, and international teams in the area of safe electricity application for more than 25 years; www.diamcons.com; am@diamcons.com. This article was previously published as an Eaton white paper:
www.eaton.eu/ecm/groups/public/@pub/@europe/@electrical/documents/content/pct_1595882.pdf

 

Related Articles


Latest Articles

  • Alberta Municipalities EV Charging Installation Rebate

    Alberta Municipalities EV Charging Installation Rebate

    April 4, 2025 Alberta Municipalities are proud to provide financial rebates for applicants to purchase and install electric vehicle charging stations in Alberta as part of the Electric Vehicle Charging Program (EVCP), funded by Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) & Alberta Municipalities.  The funding will cover up to 46% of your total project cost, which can… Read More…

  • Industry Legend Bill Smith Retires

    Industry Legend Bill Smith Retires

    April 4, 2025 By Electro-Federation Canada On March 25, Electrozad, a Sonepar Company, hosted a special retirement reception at Caesars Windsor for industry titan Bill Smith who marked an incredible 50-year career with the company.  The reception was held in the elegant Caesars Ballroom, which featured an array of food stations and elegant decor. In… Read More…

  • Schneider Electric: Your Trusted Partner in Sustainability and Efficiency

    Schneider Electric: Your Trusted Partner in Sustainability and Efficiency

    April 4, 2025 By Krystie Johnston Schneider Electric is on a mission to be the trusted partner in sustainability and efficiency. Since 1836, they have pioneered technological innovation to create a world where life is on. Frederick Morency, Vice President of Sustainability, Strategic Initiatives & Innovation at Schneider Electric Canada, has experienced this joie de… Read More…

  • The Evolving Landscape of Energy Management in Buildings with Trilliant’s Steven Lupo: AMI, EV Charging, DERs & Beyond Metering

    The Evolving Landscape of Energy Management in Buildings with Trilliant’s Steven Lupo: AMI, EV Charging, DERs & Beyond Metering

    March 31, 2025 By Blake Marchand Late last year Trilliant announced partnerships with Oshawa Power and Milton Hydro to enable suite metering and advanced metering technology using their Smart Building Platform. Those partnerships were the jumping off point for my conversation with Steven Lupo, Managing Director, North America at Trilliant, a company with four decades of innovation in Canada… Read More…


Changing Scene

  • NSAA Fee Change Effective April 1, 2025

    NSAA Fee Change Effective April 1, 2025

    As of April 1, 2025, the Nova Scotia Apprenticeship Agency’s fees have changed due to the 1% reduction in HST in Nova Scotia. NSAA noted on their website that due to the number of references across various pages, you may still come across old fee amounts as they work through updating their website. Here is… Read More…

  • Nominations Open for 2024 NETCO Leadership Excellence Award

    Nominations Open for 2024 NETCO Leadership Excellence Award

    Established in 2016, the NETCO Leadership Excellence award honours an industry training professional for his/her role for the success and their outstanding contributions to apprenticeship training and continuing electrical training. Read More…

  • Munded Partners with Kane Test Equipment in Atlantic Canada

    Munded Partners with Kane Test Equipment in Atlantic Canada

    April 4, 2025 Munden Enterprises has announced a partnership with Kane Test Equipment to bring their test and measurement solutions to Atlantic Canada. “We are now excited to announce a new and promising partnership with Kane Test Equipment. Kane Test Equipment brings innovative solutions that align with our dedication to providing the best tools for… Read More…

  • Nedco Announces Western Canadian Wire & Cable Sales Manager

    Nedco Announces Western Canadian Wire & Cable Sales Manager

    April 4, 2025 Don Blake has joined Nedco as their Western Canadian Wire & Cable Sales Manager. “With over 20 years of experience in the Wire & Cable industry, Don brings a wealth of knowledge and expertise to our Nedco West team,” said the company on LinkedIn. “His focus will be on expanding our product… Read More…