Best Practices for Using PIR Sensors, Part 2

PIR Sensors

 

June 11, 2018

This is the second of a 2-part introductory series on passive infrared (PIR) sensors. Part 1 highlighted how PIR sensors detect motion, discussed the importance of the sensor lens, and the different types of motion that can be detected. Here in Part 2: proper sensor placement and setting accurate sensitivity levels, as well as how to reduce false triggers and sensor time-outs.

Proper placement

It is essential to take care when placing a PIR sensor. With proper placement, the sensor activates correctly, and the probability of false triggers is reduced. When considering placement, it is helpful to visualize the sensing detection pattern and think about discrete slivers of coverage keeping in mind that there are gaps in coverage. It is also beneficial to consider the range of coverage, the direction in which the occupant would typically travel in an area, and the destination of that travel; for instance, an office worker walking to their desk. The best outcome when using a PIR sensor is to place it so that a person intersects several of the coverage slivers rather than walking straight to the sensor.

There are a few best practices to follow that will help ensure a PIR sensor’s maximum effectiveness and negligible false triggers. When deciding on sensor location, keep in mind that the PIR sensor is activated by a change in temperature.

Here are a few basic tips:

• Instead of placing the sensor precisely perpendicular to the door of a room, place it on the side of the room that is diagonal to the door. In that way, when someone walks into the room, the person will break more than one beam of coverage and trigger the sensor.

• Do not place sensors too close to a room’s door, so that the sensor coverage will not extend to the hallway and be triggered by people walking in a corridor.

• Place a sensor right above the occupant’s desk to detect micro movements such as flipping a page in a book, moving a mouse, or typing on a keyboard. A common mistake is to place the sensor on the ceiling behind the monitor on an occupant’s desk. In this situation, the monitor shields the occupant’s motion and the sensor will not detect it.

• Do not place sensors over HVAC ducts as the resulting change in heat temperature may trigger the sensor.

• Do not place sensors where air blowing from an open window or door would move objects such as curtains, blinds, balloons, hanging plants, or signs in the coverage area.

• Ensure that the sensor is secured on a solid surface that doesn’t vibrate. Even small vibrations, such as those caused by the air flow from ducts, can cause the sensor to see a change in energy and elicit a false trigger.

Timeouts

Sensors have timeouts to avoid continuous alerts. Timeouts refer to how long the light is lit after it detects movement. For instance, a person walking into a room that has been unoccupied for a long time with the lights off will trigger the sensor and the lights will turn on. The sensor has a single timeout configured to determine when to indicate to the system that the room is no longer occupied. Every time a person moves in the room, the sensor resets the timeout, thereby extending the time the lights remain on. As soon as the person stops moving or leaves the room, the occupancy timer starts running until it reaches the value specified as “occupancy timeout” and then it sends the event to the system that the room is unoccupied and the lights will turn off.

The actual length of the timeout is determined by how the space is used. For example, in a restroom a longer timeout might be used so that lights do not turn off when someone is in the stall. Longer timeouts may also be used in office spaces or hallways to avoid lights continually turning on/off, which can be distracting to people in the rooms lining the hallway. The length of the timeout can be adjusted on the sensor.

Adjusting sensitivity levels

Often sensors must be tweaked to accommodate sensitivity issues. For example, vibrations in factories with large machines that generate heat may require decreasing the sensor’s sensitivity.

Less sensitivity will cover a smaller area and often result in fewer false triggers but more sensor timeouts, such as the lights turning off when you are still in a room. More sensitivity will cover a larger area and result in fewer sensor timeouts but you may have more false triggers.

Traditionally, adjustments for sensitivity have been a manual process. An electrician would need to climb up on a ladder to access the sensor, remove a panel , and then turn a screw on it to increase or decrease sensitivity. Although a simple process, it can be cumbersome to scale when deploying hundreds of sensors in a building and can require a bit of trial and error before achieving the optimal sensitivity level.

Today’s lighting control systems are moving away from traditional sensitivity adjustment methods. Leading vendors are programming sensitivity mechanisms into their software, which enable easy maintenance and more precise sensitivity modifications.

Read Part 1 here: www.electricalindustry.ca/latest-news/4272-what-are-pir-sensors-and-why-do-i-need-them

Related Articles


Latest Articles

  • ESA has Identified Increasing Safety Concern Surrounding Meter Base Installations

    ESA has Identified Increasing Safety Concern Surrounding Meter Base Installations

    April 18, 2025 ESA and EFC are raising awareness on an increasing safety concern the ESA has identified surrounding meter base installations. ESA identified an increase of installed meter bases where the neutral block is isolated from the enclosure. According to OESC Rule 10-210 a bonding conductor must be installed between the meter base and… Read More…

  • Non-residential Construction Investment Continues to Reach Record Highs in January 2025

    Non-residential Construction Investment Continues to Reach Record Highs in January 2025

    April 18, 2025 Overall, investment in building construction rose 1.8% (+$393.7 million) to $22.1 billion in January. The residential sector increased 2.3% to $15.4 billion, while the non-residential sector was up 0.8% to $6.7 billion. Year over year, investment in building construction grew 5.7% in January. On a constant dollar basis (2017=100), investment in building construction increased 1.5% from the previous month to $13.2 billion… Read More…

  • BC Non-Residential Drives Growth, Multi-Family Component Drives Residential Decline in February Building Permits

    BC Non-Residential Drives Growth, Multi-Family Component Drives Residential Decline in February Building Permits

    April 18, 2025 In February, the total value of building permits issued in Canada increased by $371.3 million (+2.9%) to $13.1 billion. Gains in construction intentions were led by British Columbia’s non-residential sector. On a constant dollar basis (2017=100), the total value of building permits issued in February grew 3.2% from the previous month and was up 5.6% on… Read More…

  • Navigating Tariffs: Practical Strategies for ECABC Members

    Navigating Tariffs: Practical Strategies for ECABC Members

    April 18, 2025 Canadian businesses are facing uncertain and unprecedented risks created by tariffs on Canadian goods from the United States. The combination of the economic impact to BC’s economy from these tariffs, and the potential increase in the cost of construction materials and equipment as Canada is forced to respond with retaliatory tariffs, has… Read More…


Changing Scene

  • Ontario Introduces Legistlation to Unlock Trade and Labour Mobility Within Canada

    Ontario Introduces Legistlation to Unlock Trade and Labour Mobility Within Canada

    April 18, 2025 As a next step in its plan to protect Ontario by unleashing the province’s economy, the Ontario government is introducing the Protect Ontario through Free Trade within Canada Act to unlock free trade and labour mobility within Canada. This legislation will, if passed, create new opportunities for job creation and investment attraction, supporting economic… Read More…

  • Ontario, P.E.I. Join Nova Scotia With Legislation to Remove Internal Trade Barriers

    Ontario, P.E.I. Join Nova Scotia With Legislation to Remove Internal Trade Barriers

    April 18, 2025 Prince Edward Island and Ontario have joined the Nova Scotia by introducing reciprocal legislation that will help foster an environment of mutual recognition of goods, services and labour mobility between these provinces. “Leaders across the country are expressing interest in removing trade barriers, and I’m very pleased that P.E.I. and Ontario have… Read More…

  • New Brunswick Signs MOU with Ontario to Reduce Trade and Labour Mobility Barriers

    New Brunswick Signs MOU with Ontario to Reduce Trade and Labour Mobility Barriers

    April 18, 2025 The governments of New Brunswick and Ontario have signed a memorandum of understanding on free trade and labour mobility. “Ontario is New Brunswick’s second-biggest trading partner, and we are excited to be building on the positive momentum to reduce internal trade barriers across Canada,” said Premier Susan Holt. “Today’s signing of this… Read More…

  • EFC Welcomes New Manufacturer Member: MegaResistors Corp.

    EFC Welcomes New Manufacturer Member: MegaResistors Corp.

    April 18, 2025 Founded in 2008, MegaResistors is a proudly Canadian company specializing in the design and production of high-quality power resistors, including grounding resistors, braking resistors and resistive load banks, tailored for demanding industry and mission critical applications. Their extensive line of products helps them meet the needs of the industry, from crane control… Read More…