A Short History of Safety Norms For LEDs

January 20, 2017 

By Fausto Martin

What came first: the chicken or the egg? In technical files the answer is simple: first comes the product, then the standard. In 1993, when Nichia introduced the blue LED (based on GaN), the issue of photo biological safety was taken into consideration. The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) decided to include LEDs in the laser product category and related norms (IEC 60825). This decision was based on the use of infrared LED in the fibre communication system due to its very narrow band.

A few years later — 1996 — IESNA published ANSI/IESNA RP27.1, “Photobiological safety for lamps and lamp systems – general requirements,” providing some norms for sources other than laser.

In 2002, the International Commission on Illumination adopted the main part of ANSI/IESNA RP27.1 as the basis for a new norm S009/E-2002: “Photobiological safety of lamps and lamp systems”; four years later the fast improvement and diffusion of LEDs in other fields led the IEC to draft the 60825, a very severe Norm for “general purpose” LED. From now on, LEDs are no longer considered as a LASER equivalent source.

Around 2006 IEC adopted the guidelines specified in S009/E-2002 jointly with IEC 62471:2006 “Photobiological safety of lamps and lamp systems;” two years later the European edition of EN 62471 was published. It provides guidance for evaluating the photobiological safety of lamps and lamp systems, including luminaires. It specifies the exposure limits, reference measurement technique and classification scheme for evaluating and controlling photobiological hazards from all electrically powered incoherent broadband sources of optical radiation, including LEDs but excluding lasers, in the wavelength range from 200 nm through 3000 nm. In particular, some limit values are specified based on six risk categories for human skin and eyes up to 8 hours of exposition, considered as a standard working time.

Photobiological safety of lamps: EN 62471

Light radiation can damage the skin and eyes. Any light source can cause damage, not just LEDs. European legislation obliges manufacturers to perform laboratory tests and writing on the lamp the risk category (if present). More, the emission limits shall not be exceeded. Test to run, risk classes and emission limits are defined in EN 62471. The tests and emission limits are not easy to understand because they require specific technical knowledge and only experts and equipped laboratories can assess the lamp hazards. What we can do is to understand the hazard of the various classes and if there are “risk free” lamps.

The potential damage from the light varies with the radiation wavelength and the quantity received.The quantity is given by the power for the exposure time. Intense radiation requires less time to cause damage at a lesser intensity.

Here’s an example to clarify the context: you can get sunburned if exposed for one hour on July 21 at noon, whereas you would require eight hours of exposure in March.

The radiance and irradiance measurements are carried out at the distance at which it produces an illuminance of 500 lux and to not less than 200 mm in the case of general lighting devices and 200 mm for all others.

EN 62471 defines the following the exposure limits for the different groups…

Lamps belonging to Group 3 cannot be used for general lighting.

According to the typical spectral emission, just a few lamps may be dangerous:

In these cases, the lamps must bear on the packaging the risk group.

With regard to blue light, whereas the values stated above it is possible to define a value of the illumination (at the level of the eyes) as a function of the colour temperature (CCT) of the lamp, under which the exposure is equal to or less than the group 1:

In the chart above, a higher colour temperature (CCT) is related to a higher power in the blue wavelength. In other words, the risk can be simply checked by a measurement of illuminance with a cheap and easy to use instrument: a lux meter.

Fausto Martin is an electrical engineer in Italy and a visiting professor at Madrid University (Spain).

Related Articles


Latest Articles

  • Littelfuse: Solid-State Industrial Relays Quality Test Report

    Littelfuse: Solid-State Industrial Relays Quality Test Report

    April 21, 2025 Littelfuse Provides Insights Into Their Solid-State Industrial Relays Introduction Solid-State Relays (SSRs) are a critical component in modern electrical & electronic systems, providing reliable switching capabilities for various applications from industrial automation to consumer electronics. When it comes to choosing the right solid-state relay for your application, it’s important to know the… Read More…

  • PataBid vs. Accubid Classic: How Electrical Estimating Software is Evolving

    PataBid vs. Accubid Classic: How Electrical Estimating Software is Evolving

    April 21, 2025 By Melvin Newman, Patabid CEO The landscape of construction technology — especially in electrical estimating software—is evolving at a rapid pace. With the rise of cloud-based platforms, AI-driven automation, and advanced data integration, contractors now have more options than ever when choosing the right digital estimating tool.    With the rise of… Read More…

  • ESA has Identified Increasing Safety Concern Surrounding Meter Base Installations

    ESA has Identified Increasing Safety Concern Surrounding Meter Base Installations

    April 18, 2025 ESA and EFC are raising awareness on an increasing safety concern the ESA has identified surrounding meter base installations. ESA identified an increase of installed meter bases where the neutral block is isolated from the enclosure. According to OESC Rule 10-210 a bonding conductor must be installed between the meter base and… Read More…

  • Non-residential Construction Investment Continues to Reach Record Highs in January 2025

    Non-residential Construction Investment Continues to Reach Record Highs in January 2025

    April 18, 2025 Overall, investment in building construction rose 1.8% (+$393.7 million) to $22.1 billion in January. The residential sector increased 2.3% to $15.4 billion, while the non-residential sector was up 0.8% to $6.7 billion. Year over year, investment in building construction grew 5.7% in January. On a constant dollar basis (2017=100), investment in building construction increased 1.5% from the previous month to $13.2 billion… Read More…


Changing Scene

  • nVent Sustainability Report Highlights Progress and Focus on Electrification

    nVent Sustainability Report Highlights Progress and Focus on Electrification

    April 15, 2025 nVent Electric plc announced the release of its 2024 Sustainability Report. The new report highlights nVent’s achievements in each of its sustainability focus areas: People, Products, Planet and Governance. The report also highlights how nVent solutions support electrification, digitalization and sustainability efforts around the world. “nVent is becoming a more focused electrical… Read More…

  • Ontario Introduces Legistlation to Unlock Trade and Labour Mobility Within Canada

    Ontario Introduces Legistlation to Unlock Trade and Labour Mobility Within Canada

    April 18, 2025 As a next step in its plan to protect Ontario by unleashing the province’s economy, the Ontario government is introducing the Protect Ontario through Free Trade within Canada Act to unlock free trade and labour mobility within Canada. This legislation will, if passed, create new opportunities for job creation and investment attraction, supporting economic… Read More…

  • Ontario, P.E.I. Join Nova Scotia With Legislation to Remove Internal Trade Barriers

    Ontario, P.E.I. Join Nova Scotia With Legislation to Remove Internal Trade Barriers

    April 18, 2025 Prince Edward Island and Ontario have joined the Nova Scotia by introducing reciprocal legislation that will help foster an environment of mutual recognition of goods, services and labour mobility between these provinces. “Leaders across the country are expressing interest in removing trade barriers, and I’m very pleased that P.E.I. and Ontario have… Read More…

  • New Brunswick Signs MOU with Ontario to Reduce Trade and Labour Mobility Barriers

    New Brunswick Signs MOU with Ontario to Reduce Trade and Labour Mobility Barriers

    April 18, 2025 The governments of New Brunswick and Ontario have signed a memorandum of understanding on free trade and labour mobility. “Ontario is New Brunswick’s second-biggest trading partner, and we are excited to be building on the positive momentum to reduce internal trade barriers across Canada,” said Premier Susan Holt. “Today’s signing of this… Read More…